MDS/openide
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitflic.ru/project/openide/openide.git synced 2026-09-27 10:03:11 +07:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

wording

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Bas Leijdekkers
2013-11-18 12:22:26 +01:00
parent 79514921a5
commit 2e427c84f6
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
java/java-tests/testSrc/com/intellij/refactoring/InplaceIntroduceParameterTest.java
+1 -1
View File
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ public class InplaceIntroduceParameterTest extends AbstractJavaInplaceIntroduceT
});
}
catch (BaseRefactoringProcessor.ConflictsInTestsException e) {
assertEquals("There is already a parameter <b><code>p</code></b>. It will conflict with an introduced parameter", e.getMessage());
assertEquals("There is already a parameter <b><code>p</code></b>. It will conflict with the introduced parameter", e.getMessage());
return;
}
fail("Conflict expected");
platform/platform-resources-en/src/messages/RefactoringBundle.properties
+1 -1
View File
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ add.parameters.for.fields.to.constructors=Add parameters for &fields to construc
0.already.contains.inner.class.named.1={0} already contains inner class named {1}
0.uses.1.which.is.pushed.down={0} uses {1}, which is pushed down
refactoring.cannot.be.performed=Refactoring cannot be performed
there.is.already.a.0.it.will.conflict.with.an.introduced.parameter=There is already a {0}. It will conflict with an introduced parameter
there.is.already.a.0.it.will.conflict.with.an.introduced.parameter=There is already a {0}. It will conflict with the introduced parameter
introduce.parameter.command=Extracting parameter to {0}
parameter.initializer.contains.0.but.not.all.calls.to.method.are.in.its.class=Parameter initializer contains {0}, but not all calls to method are in its class
0.is.not.accessible.from.1.value.for.introduced.parameter.in.that.method.call.will.be.incorrect={0} is not accessible from {1}. Value for introduced parameter in that method call will be incorrect.