mirror of
https://gitflic.ru/project/openide/openide.git
synced 2025-12-15 11:53:49 +07:00
e4d7a000db
Usage of continuation indents (which presumably are wider than normal indents) in the headers of control statements was supposed to prevent PEP8's error E125 "Continuation line with same indent as next logical line". However such indents is not necessary for e.g. nested function calls where indent of the arguments is already visually distinctive (larger) from the offset of the following statement list. To distinguish such cases I've added check that argument list is located on the same line as the header of the containing control statement. If line numbers differ we use normal indent for the arguments and continuation indent otherwise. It doesn't matter for complex non-hanging indent cases like if foo(bar(1... because alignment will be used there anyway.
4 lines
204 B
Python
4 lines
204 B
Python
with raises_assertion(
|
|
has_string('Missing download_urls: {}, {}'.format(
|
|
self.other_download_url, self.another_download_url))):
|
|
fixture.assert_detail_page_yields_expected() |