Roman Golyshev 1e49336fc1 KTIJ-30908 [kotlin] Do not propose ChangeVisibilityFix on KtParameter unless it has val/var ...

Also, skip all the private declarations on the way to the parent declaration

N.B. `exposedConstructorParameterType_val.kt` doesn't work in K1, because there
is a more advanced check which checks if the changed visibility modifier will
actually make the problem go away
(see `ExposedVisibilityChecker.checkDeclarationWithVisibility`).

In the case of the constructor value parameter, the exposure error will stay,
but it can be fixed by also making the constructor private with a second invocation
of the quickfix.

^KTIJ-30908 Fixed

GitOrigin-RevId: ff4207a3dc71b7c185112aa128a13e10c38fd895

2024-08-08 11:45:18 +00:00

..

exposedConstructorParameterType_privateVal.kt

…

exposedConstructorParameterType_privateVal.kt.after

…

exposedConstructorParameterType_val.kt

…

exposedConstructorParameterType_val.kt.after

…

exposedConstructorParameterType.kt

…

exposedConstructorParameterType.kt.after

…

exposedParameterType_privateType.kt

…

exposedParameterType.kt

…

exposedParameterType.kt.after

…

exposedPropertyType.kt

…

exposedPropertyType.kt.after

…

exposedReceiverType.kt

…

exposedReceiverTypeInternal.kt

…

exposedReceiverTypeInternal.kt.after

…

exposedReceiverTypePrivate.kt

…

exposedReceiverTypePrivate.kt.after

…

exposedReturnType.kt

…

exposedReturnType.kt.after

…

exposedSuperClass.kt

…

exposedSuperClass.kt.after

…

exposedSuperClassProtectedBase.kt

…

exposedSuperClassProtectedBase.kt.after

…

exposedSuperClassProtectedInAnother.kt

…

exposedSuperClassProtectedInAnother.kt.after

…

exposedSuperInterface.kt

…

exposedSuperInterface.kt.after

…

exposedSuperInterfacePrivate.kt

…

exposedSuperInterfacePrivate.kt.after

…

exposedTypeInAnnotation.kt

…

exposedTypeParameterBound.kt

…

exposedTypeParameterBound.kt.after

…

exposedTypeParameterBoundNested.kt

…