don't suggest to make parameters for field @NotNull if the parameters don't belong to a constructor

java/java-tests/testData/inspection/nullableProblems/NotNullFieldInitializedInLambda.java

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+import org.jetbrains.annotations.*;
+
+class Test {
+  <warning descr="Not-null fields must be initialized">@NotNull</warning> Object member;
+  <warning descr="Not-null fields must be initialized">@NotNull</warning> Object member2;
+
+  public Test(Object p) {
+    I i = param -> {
+      member = param;
+    };
+    I i2 = new I() {
+      @Override
+      public void foo(Object param) {
+        member2 = param;
+      }
+    };
+    i.foo(p);
+    i2.foo(p);
+  }
+}
+
+interface I {
+  void foo(Object param);
+}

java/java-tests/testSrc/com/intellij/codeInspection/NullableStuffInspectionTest.java

@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@ public class NullableStuffInspectionTest extends LightCodeInsightFixtureTestCase
   public void testNotNullCustomException() throws Exception{ doTest(); }
 
   public void testNotNullFieldNotInitialized() throws Exception{ doTest(); }
+  public void testNotNullFieldInitializedInLambda() { doTest(); }
   public void testNotNullFieldNotInitializedInOneConstructor() { doTest(); }
   public void testNotNullFieldNotInitializedSetting() {
     myInspection.REQUIRE_NOTNULL_FIELDS_INITIALIZED = false;