MDS/openide
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://gitflic.ru/project/openide/openide.git synced 2026-01-07 13:39:36 +07:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

lambda: highlight containing method ambiguity on method name: this avoids lots of lines of lambda body to be highlighted and it would show errors even if lambda body contains errors actually caused by the ambiguity on the parent level (IDEA-141580)

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Anna Kozlova
2015-06-18 16:22:27 +03:00
parent 1b3a089335
commit 30a12275a2
22 changed files with 57 additions and 55 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
java/java-tests/testData/codeInsight/daemonCodeAnalyzer/lambda/overloadResolution/DetectPolyExpressionInReturnsOfExplicitlyTypedLambdaWhenPrimitiveCouldWin.java
View File

@@ -11,12 +11,12 @@ class Test {
}
void test(boolean cond) {
m<error descr="Cannot resolve method 'm(<lambda expression>)'">(() -> {
<error descr="Cannot resolve method 'm(<lambda expression>)'">m</error>(() -> {
if (cond)
return 42;
else
return foo();
})</error>;
});
m(() -> {
return foo();

2
java/java-tests/testData/codeInsight/daemonCodeAnalyzer/lambda/overloadResolution/IDEA102800.java
View File

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ class Test {
}
void fooBar(IntStream1 instr){
Supplier<Stream<Integer>> si = () -> instr.map ((i) -> (( <error descr="Operator '%' cannot be applied to '<lambda parameter>', 'int'">i % 2</error>) == 0) ? i : -i).boxed();
Supplier<Stream<Integer>> si = () -> instr.<error descr="Ambiguous method call: both 'IntStream1.map(IntFunction<Integer>)' and 'IntStream1.map(IntUnaryOperator)' match">map</error> ((i) -> (( <error descr="Operator '%' cannot be applied to '<lambda parameter>', 'int'">i % 2</error>) == 0) ? i : -i).boxed();
System.out.println(si);
Supplier<Stream<Integer>> si1 = () -> instr.map <error descr="Ambiguous method call: both 'IntStream1.map(IntFunction<Integer>)' and 'IntStream1.map(IntUnaryOperator)' match">(null)</error>.boxed();
System.out.println(si1);

2
java/java-tests/testData/codeInsight/daemonCodeAnalyzer/lambda/overloadResolution/PertinentToApplicabilityOfExplicitlyTypedLambda.java
View File

@@ -12,6 +12,6 @@ abstract class PertinentToApplicabilityOfExplicitlyTypedLambdaTest {
abstract void foo(B b);
{
foo<error descr="Cannot resolve method 'foo(<lambda expression>)'">(x -> y -> 42)</error>;
<error descr="Cannot resolve method 'foo(<lambda expression>)'">foo</error>(x -> y -> 42);
}
}

4
java/java-tests/testData/codeInsight/daemonCodeAnalyzer/lambda/overloadResolution/VoidValueCompatibilityOfImplicitlyTypedLambda.java
View File

@@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ abstract class Test {
foo(x -> {
return x += 1;
});
foo<error descr="Ambiguous method call: both 'Test.foo(A)' and 'Test.foo(B)' match">(x -> x += 1)</error>;
<error descr="Ambiguous method call: both 'Test.foo(A)' and 'Test.foo(B)' match">foo</error>(x -> x += 1);
foo(x -> 1);
foo(x -> <error descr="Operator '!' cannot be applied to 'int'">!x</error>);
foo<error descr="Ambiguous method call: both 'Test.foo(A)' and 'Test.foo(B)' match">(x -> ++x)</error>;
<error descr="Ambiguous method call: both 'Test.foo(A)' and 'Test.foo(B)' match">foo</error>(x -> ++x);
foo(x -> o instanceof String ? 1 : 0);
}
}